
Originally Posted by
DeeezNuuuts83
But the difference is because judging can be flawed, especially when the so-called "judges" aren't really "trained" to judge battles. In most cases, they're no different than any other fan making a YouTube comment saying who they thought won. And even "professional" judges can make mistakes or just not get the picture. Just look at the outcome of Pacquiao-Bradley, if you're into boxing. Sure, it's mostly subjective (in terms of assigning points since it's their opinion of who won the round), but there's really no argument for why the outcome was the way it was. And they even make objective errors too, like how one judge incorrectly scored the first round of Pacquiao-Marquez I as 10-7 instead of 10-6 when there's no debate about Pacquiao having knocked him down three times, which warrants a 10-6.
But back to battle rap, judges in this arena have been flawed MANY times. Look at Head Ice vs. Cortez (Lion's Den), where everyone thought that the hip-hop legends judging the battle slept on Cortez. Or look at Cortez vs. Soul Khan (Grind Time), where Soul Khan should've won in three but somehow lost in overtime, even though he still had a better round. Or look at Dirtbag Dan vs. Anygma (Fliptop), where Anygma was dope (especially considering English probably wasn't his first language) but didn't really beat DBD, while the all-Filipino panel of judges there in the Philippines pretty much gave a (biased) UD win to Anygma... it can be argued that he may have won, but for every judge to have given the win to Anygma is very questionable.
Also, just ask yourself, how many battles have you watched where it was debatable and had to watch it a second time? Or how many battles have you watched and thought one guy won, but later thought the other guy won? Or how many times did you watch a battle and later catch lines that you didn't originally catch? Again, that's the problem with judged rap battles based on the decisions of a handful of people who are forced to make their decision on the spot. That's what now separates it from other things that are judged, especially with how much more complicated battle rap is now compared to ten years ago when guys were just making fun of their opponent's clothes. Boxing can certainly be re-watched and yield different opinions of the same fight, but it's only because opinions can change, not necessarily because they "missed" something, which can happen more easily in battle rap. Also, if you like bars over performance, you may be inclined to put more value in bars than performance, whereas if you were a Cotto fan and didn't like the defensive style of Mayweather, your preference can't dismiss the fact that Cotto got outboxed during much of their fight.